Clyde Snow

Supreme Court Establishes Higher Standard Regarding Religious Accommodations

by | Jul 5, 2023

On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court held in favor of an evangelical Christian postal worker and established a higher standard that employers must follow when responding to a religious accommodation request. In Groff v. Dejoy, the Court ruled unanimously that the prior standard – the “de minimis standard” – was insufficient under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and instead introduced the “substantial increased costs” standard. 

The Prior “De Minimis Cost” Standard

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act generally requires employers to grant religious accommodations unless they pose an “undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business.” In 1977, in Trans World Airlines v. Hardison, the Supreme Court evaluated whether accommodating a religious accommodation request would constitute an “undue hardship” by considering whether it would impose anything more than a de minimis cost. That “de minimis cost” standard has now been rejected, and employers who deny a religious accommodation request must show that providing the accommodation would have “result[ed] in substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct” of the employer’s business. 

The Groff v. Dejoy Ruling

In Groff, the religious postal worker was required to work Sundays despite asserting that Sundays were his day of rest and worship. In the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, the U.S. Postal Service overcame Groff’s arguments by arguing that Groff’s rural and leanly-staffed post office could not accommodate Groff’s accommodation request because by doing so, it would “place[] a great strain on the Holtwood Post Office personnel” and that “other carriers [would be] forced to cover Groff’s shifts and give up their family time [and] their ability to attend church services if they would have liked to.” Though the Third Circuit was persuaded, the Supreme Court was not. Writing in concurrence, Justice Sotomayor noted that the burdens on employers’ other employees could potentially constitute an undue hardship if they were significant enough. 

What Does the New Religious Accommodation Standard Mean for Employers?

In a nutshell, employers need to carefully analyze future religious accommodation requests to determine whether such an accommodation would “result in substantial increased costs” to their businesses. It is no longer sufficient to cite moderate costs or inconveniences. In addition, employers must remember that this new accommodation standard applies equally to all sincerely held religious beliefs. Thus, all religious accommodation requests must be fairly considered to ensure compliance with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 

This decision by the Supreme Court upends decades of case law interpreting and applying the religious accommodation standard under Title VII, and it will take many years of test cases to re-develop the law.

Clyde Snow’s Labor & Employment Group will continue to monitor developments with respect to this decision and advise as to best practices. For more information or any questions regarding religious accommodations or any other employment matters, you may contact Trent Lowe at or (801) 433-2419.

Sign up for our latest updates.

Recent Posts

Ripple Effect 151: Discover Ag. Podcast

Tara Vander Dussen, Co-Host of the Discover Ag. Podcast, joins us for a lively and informative discussion about agricultural news and information. We dive into the presence and impact of social media, themes and trends, and why the new “food curious” movement is...

Ripple Effect 150: Colorado River Authority of Utah

Amy Haas, Executive Director of the Colorado River Authority of Utah, talks us through the inception of the entity, how it executes its mission to protect and defend Utah’s portion of the Colorado River, and where the Authority is leading out in tackling hard...

Ripple Effect 149: Watershed Improvements for Carbon Credits

Alex Johnson, Chief Strategic Officer for Virridy, walks us through this Company’s unique, and very innovative, platform to merge monitoring water quality improvements with selling carbon credits on the voluntary carbon market. Hint – treating water is energy...

Ripple Effect 148: Scaling Up! H2O – from Host to Guest!

In this very special episode, Emily joins the podcast not as a host, but as a guest! Join us as our beloved host Emily Lewis takes the spotlight on an entirely separate water podcast - 'Scaling Up! H2O.' Here's your chance to get personal with our host....

Ripple Effect 147: Snow Report 2023-2024

Jordan Clayton, Supervisor for the Utah Snow Survey at NRCS, joins us to discuss the status of Utah’s snow year and our water supply. Good news – after a slow start, the State is overall at 102% of normal. Bad news – we have a long way to go in the water year and we...

Ripple Effect 146: 2024 Legislative Preview!

Jeff Gittins joins us to discuss upcoming bills for the 2024 Legislative Sessions. A couple key bills, notes, and lots of follow-up tweaks for the last couple years of policy. As always, a great discussion; and check-out Jeff’s Utah Water Law and Water Rights blog.

Ripple Effect 145: 2024 Water Preview: Its Going to be Awesome!

Shaina Shay, Owner and Editor of The Water Report, shares her insights as to what will be big in 2024! PFAS, the Energy Water Nexus, Colorado River, Technology, and Aging Infrastructure all make an appearance. Shaina always brings thoughtful commentary and a unique...

Related Posts