Clyde Snow

Supreme Court Establishes Higher Standard Regarding Religious Accommodations

by | Jul 5, 2023

On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court held in favor of an evangelical Christian postal worker and established a higher standard that employers must follow when responding to a religious accommodation request. In Groff v. Dejoy, the Court ruled unanimously that the prior standard – the “de minimis standard” – was insufficient under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and instead introduced the “substantial increased costs” standard. 

The Prior “De Minimis Cost” Standard

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act generally requires employers to grant religious accommodations unless they pose an “undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business.” In 1977, in Trans World Airlines v. Hardison, the Supreme Court evaluated whether accommodating a religious accommodation request would constitute an “undue hardship” by considering whether it would impose anything more than a de minimis cost. That “de minimis cost” standard has now been rejected, and employers who deny a religious accommodation request must show that providing the accommodation would have “result[ed] in substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct” of the employer’s business. 

The Groff v. Dejoy Ruling

In Groff, the religious postal worker was required to work Sundays despite asserting that Sundays were his day of rest and worship. In the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, the U.S. Postal Service overcame Groff’s arguments by arguing that Groff’s rural and leanly-staffed post office could not accommodate Groff’s accommodation request because by doing so, it would “place[] a great strain on the Holtwood Post Office personnel” and that “other carriers [would be] forced to cover Groff’s shifts and give up their family time [and] their ability to attend church services if they would have liked to.” Though the Third Circuit was persuaded, the Supreme Court was not. Writing in concurrence, Justice Sotomayor noted that the burdens on employers’ other employees could potentially constitute an undue hardship if they were significant enough. 

What Does the New Religious Accommodation Standard Mean for Employers?

In a nutshell, employers need to carefully analyze future religious accommodation requests to determine whether such an accommodation would “result in substantial increased costs” to their businesses. It is no longer sufficient to cite moderate costs or inconveniences. In addition, employers must remember that this new accommodation standard applies equally to all sincerely held religious beliefs. Thus, all religious accommodation requests must be fairly considered to ensure compliance with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 

This decision by the Supreme Court upends decades of case law interpreting and applying the religious accommodation standard under Title VII, and it will take many years of test cases to re-develop the law.

Clyde Snow’s Labor & Employment Group will continue to monitor developments with respect to this decision and advise as to best practices. For more information or any questions regarding religious accommodations or any other employment matters, you may contact Trent Lowe at or (801) 433-2419.

Sign up for our latest updates.

Recent Posts

Ripple Effect Rewind! – Silver-Buckshot

This week we are revisiting an earlier episode that is still highly relevant to today's water discussion. We are looking back on episode 43: Silver-Buckshot.Jesse Clark of Stream Landscape Architecture and Planning talks us through his many projects and the...

Ripple Effect Rewind! – River City

This week we are revisiting an earlier episode that is still highly relevant to today's water discussion. We are looking back on episode 21: River City.Soren Simonsen, Executive Director of the Jordan River Commission, discusses the importance of vibrant urban...

Ripple Effect 161: Maven’s Notebook

Chris Austin, publisher of Maven’s Notebook, walks us through her EXCELLENT website covering all things California water news. Maven’s Notebook is brimming with timely and comprehensive information on a number of hot topics. Chris discusses collaboration as both the...

Ripple Effect 160: Great Salt Lake Issues Forum

Lynn de Freitas, Executive Director of Friends of Great Salt Lake, joins us to discuss their 2024 Great Salt Lake Issues Forum – "Great Salt Lake: To Preserve and Protect in Perpetuity, How are We Doing?" A great conversation about how to gauge progress on the Lake...

Ripple Effect 159: Solar Panels Over Canals

Jon Parry, Assistant Manager for Weber Basin Water Conservancy District, joins us to discuss the many benefits of their solar panel demonstration project over the Layton Canal. This project is so cool on so many levels and has some serious potential for scalability...

Ripple Effect 158: HDH Desalination Technology

Christopher Link, Founder, joins us to discuss his HDH Desalination Technology and his HALO Team’s participation in Elon Musk’s X-Prize Competition. Do not miss this conversation! So many interesting and innovative ideas occurring about how to incentivize useful water...

Related Posts