Clyde Snow

What is the Statute of Limitations for Wage Claims under the Utah Payment of Wages Act?

by | Feb 5, 2021

As discussed in our prior post, the Utah Payment of Wages Act (UPWA) provides for wage claims to be filed to two forums: the Wage Claim Unit of the Utah Labor Commission and the courts. In general, claims for $10,000 or less are filed with the Labor Commission, and claims for over $10,000 are filed with the courts.

The UPWA is clear that wage claims filed with the Labor Commission must be filed “within one year after the day on which the wages were earned.” Utah Code § 34-28-9(1)(e). However, the UPWA does not clearly identify a deadline for filing claims with the courts. The UPWA has thus left many employers and employees (and their lawyers) in the dark as to what limitation period applies to wage claims filed with the courts. I have seen defendants argue that the one-year statute of limitation found in Utah Code § 34-28-9(1)(e) is applicable to all UPWA claims, regardless of where they are filed. However, that argument is weak because the one-year limitations period is embedded in a description of the Labor Commission’s enforcement procedure.

Recently, in Scholzen v. Scholzen Prod. Co., No. 4:20-CV-00019-DN-PK, 2020 WL 7630801 (D. Utah Dec. 22, 2020), the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah held that for UPWA claims filed in court, a three-year limitations period applies. The court reasoned, “A personal wage claim would appear to be an action afforded ‘for a liability created by the statutes of this state,’ for which the three-year statute of limitations is applicable.” Id. at *6. The court cited to Utah Code § 78B-2-305, which states, “An action may be brought within three years . . . for a liability created by the statutes of this state, . . . except where in special cases a different limitation is prescribed by the statutes of this state.”

Because Scholzen is an unpublished interpretation of a state statute by a federal court, it may not be last word on the issue. But it is helpful for employers and employees to have some guidance on what has previously been an entirely open question.

 

Sign up for our latest updates.


Recent Posts

Ripple Effect Rewind! – Silver-Buckshot

This week we are revisiting an earlier episode that is still highly relevant to today's water discussion. We are looking back on episode 43: Silver-Buckshot.Jesse Clark of Stream Landscape Architecture and Planning talks us through his many projects and the...

Ripple Effect Rewind! – River City

This week we are revisiting an earlier episode that is still highly relevant to today's water discussion. We are looking back on episode 21: River City.Soren Simonsen, Executive Director of the Jordan River Commission, discusses the importance of vibrant urban...

Ripple Effect 161: Maven’s Notebook

Chris Austin, publisher of Maven’s Notebook, walks us through her EXCELLENT website covering all things California water news. Maven’s Notebook is brimming with timely and comprehensive information on a number of hot topics. Chris discusses collaboration as both the...

Ripple Effect 160: Great Salt Lake Issues Forum

Lynn de Freitas, Executive Director of Friends of Great Salt Lake, joins us to discuss their 2024 Great Salt Lake Issues Forum – "Great Salt Lake: To Preserve and Protect in Perpetuity, How are We Doing?" A great conversation about how to gauge progress on the Lake...

Ripple Effect 159: Solar Panels Over Canals

Jon Parry, Assistant Manager for Weber Basin Water Conservancy District, joins us to discuss the many benefits of their solar panel demonstration project over the Layton Canal. This project is so cool on so many levels and has some serious potential for scalability...

Ripple Effect 158: HDH Desalination Technology

Christopher Link, Founder, joins us to discuss his HDH Desalination Technology and his HALO Team’s participation in Elon Musk’s X-Prize Competition. Do not miss this conversation! So many interesting and innovative ideas occurring about how to incentivize useful water...

Related Posts